That is due to an App Store restriction that all third-party browsers have to adhere. Performanceīrave uses the WKWebView renderer, which is the same engine that powers Safari. In comparison, Brave can be a tad rough around the edges, which is not surprising considering the fact that it’s still relatively new on iOS. But it’s hard to deny the fact that Safari’s user interface feels more polished and responsive. The location of the Brave menu poses a problem when surfing single-handedĪside from that, both browsers work well in action. And even then, using the tab switcher is far more convenient. And considering that you have to use it often to access your bookmarks, Safari’s positioning of a dedicated Bookmarks icon within the navigation bar itself works far better.įurthermore, Brave features desktop-like tabs, which really make no sense on a tiny mobile screen unless you plan to use the browser in landscape mode. The location of the Brave menu poses a problem when surfing single-handed. However, there are some odd UI elements in Brave. But unlike Safari, it won’t feature a list of frequently visited sites, which is better from a privacy perspective. Compared to Safari, Brave’s user interface looks strikingly similar - both browsers feature their navigation bars to the bottom of the screen, with similar positions used for the Back and Forward, Share, and Tab Switcher icons.īrave lets you add a list of favorite sites to new tabs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |